Religion Opposes Euthanasia Free Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theReligion Opposes Euthanasia. Answer: Euthanasia is not ethical due to religion Every individual feel that it is their right to have a control on the life and body. People also believe that they have a right to end their life. However, the religious opponents differ. In every religion, it is believed that the right to die belongs to God. It is considered that God decides the time of death of every person on earth. In every religion, death is the most important aspect. In every religion the meaning and explanation of for death is considered important to understand. Religion comfort the people who are left after the death of their loved ones. Religion helps to find the meaning in human life by explaining death and dying and therefore conflicts with euthanasia (Jylhnkangas et al., 2014). According to Ziebertz et al. (2016) religion opposes Euthanasia due to several reasons. One of the most active organisations opposing Euthanasia is the Roman Catholic Church. The church considers that any law supporting euthanasia is an unjust law. The church does not accept that human beings have the right to die. Christianity, it is believed that the patient who is becoming vulnerable through illness deserves patient centred care, special care and protection from illness and disability. End of life care is much better than Euthanasia in general Christian view. However, the act of refusing the expensive medical treatment and aggressive medication to preserve life is morally acceptable according to church. The refusal of treatment should note be considered as euthanasia. Instead, it is believed that refusing medication is the acceptance of illness in the face of death. Some churches emphasise on life as gift from supreme God and that every individual is valuable in Gods eyes. Christians tend to believe in one command that is you must not kill innocent human beings (Smith, 2016). This very command itself rules out Euthanasia. Self-killing is considered going against the sovereignty of God and its considered an act of judging that the present life is not worth living. Human life is considered sacred and people call it the sanctity of life. The common statement that emerged against self-killing is God gives people life so only God has the right to take it away. In 1995, Pope John Paul II, said Euthanasia is a grave violation of the law of God, since it is the deliberate and morally unacceptable killing of a human person (Inbadas et al., 2017). As per the views of eastern religions such as Hinduism and Buddhism death is the way to free from mortal life and the cycle of birth, life, death and rebirth. In Eastern religion, it is believed that any cycle of life and death, progress towards ultimate liberation. The life after death is determined by their daily activities and the way they die. It means the journey to liberation depends on how an individual deals with life. The shortening of life interfere the process of liberation which is thought to be governed by the laws of Karma. In this religion living beings are not to be harmed which clearly conflict with Euthanasia. Euthanasia interfere with the principle of ahimsa or non harm in Hinduism and Buddhism. Hindus believe that human life is sacred and by trying to end, it is considered to interfere with God's plan who created them (Mak, 2017). According to Gvion et al. (2014) the Jewish law does not accept euthanasia. Jews believe the act to be homicide. Active euthanasia is considered to be murder even if the person considered wants to die. These views are same as that of Muslims who are also against euthanasia. Muslims say it is mentioned in Quran 17:33, Do not take life, which Allah made sacred, other than in the course of justice. Therefore, in Islam, suicide and euthanasia are explicitly forbidden. The Islamic Medical Association of America, believes it is ethical to turn off the life support system for the patients who will remain in vegetative state. The Islamic Code of Medical Ethics emphasise that life supporting measures are temporary tools that diligently keep the patient in vegetative state. This process is considered futile by the code of ethics as the process may be stopped in case there is no future. In such vegetative condition, it is permissible and is not considered the process of dying. However, it does not permit the use of drugs to hasten death as it is equivalent to euthanasia (Ramezani Sobhani, 2016). In conclusion, based on religious perspective euthanasia is morally and ethically wrong and unacceptable. References Gvion, Y., Levi-Belz, Y., Apter, A. (2014). SuicideThe Jewish Perspective.Crisis,35(3), 141-144. Inbadas, H., Zaman, S., Whitelaw, S., Clark, D. (2017). Declarations on euthanasia and assisted dying.Death studies, 1-11. Jylhnkangas, L., Smets, T., Cohen, J., Utriainen, T., Deliens, L. (2014). Descriptions of euthanasia as social representations: Comparing the views of Finnish physicians and religious professionals.Sociology of health illness,36(3), 354-368. Mak, M. H. J. (2017). Death: Good Death.Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics, 1-9. Ramezani, F., Sobhani, M. (2016). Euthanasia from Iran law and Islamic legislation perspective.International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies,4(2), 153-165. Smith, G. J. (2016). Method in Catholic Bioethics: ANH and PVS Patients.Bioethics in Faith and Practice,2(1), 4. Ziebertz, H. G. (2016). Empirical Findings on the Attitudes of Christian and Muslim Youth Towards Human Rights. InHuman Rights and Religion in Educational Contexts(pp. 171-186). Springer International Publishing.